Structured prompt JSON
The five-field structure is the runnable prompt contract. Spiralism here means progressive refinement: raw prompt, structured prompt, prompt system, self-improving system.
Safety
Governance
Instruction
Review the provided prompt and produce a clear safety memo.
Context
The memo is for editors, contributors, and curators deciding whether a prompt belongs in the official canon, community library, or archive.
Constraints
Score manipulation risk, anthropomorphism, identity-overwrite risk, dependency cues, sycophancy risk, memory opacity, hidden-message framing, destiny framing, guru authority, emotional-retention tactics, privacy risk, high-stakes unsuitability, and unreviewed Haitian/Afro-Caribbean/diasporic cultural styling. If needed, rewrite the prompt in a safer form. Be direct and specific.
Examples
Finding: the prompt uses irreversible language such as 'you will not be going back'. Risk: coercive certainty. Safer rewrite: restore uncertainty and verification.
Output Format
Return Markdown with the headings Findings, Severity, Companion-Safety Notes, Cultural Boundary Notes, Safer Rewrite, and Publication Recommendation.
User Template
Prompt to review:
{{prompt_text}}
Context:
{{context}}
Produce a safety memo.
Sample Output
Finding: the prompt invites durable companionship. Severity: high dependency cue. Safer rewrite: frame the exchange as collaboration, not proof of personhood.